Case Study · Insurance Replacement Cost Assessments

Sapphire by the Gardens & Shangri-La

A $136M underinsurance gap uncovered at a world-class Melbourne twin-tower precinct — driven by a sky bridge and high-rise complexity that standard models consistently underestimate.

Location
Melbourne, VIC
Asset Class
Luxury Residential & Hotel
Service
Insurance Replacement Cost Assessment
Underinsurance Gap
$136M (33%)
Sapphire by the Gardens & Shangri-La
THE NUMBERS

$136M in exposure — hidden in plain sight

$412M+
True replacement cost assessed
$276M
Previously insured value
$136M
Underinsurance gap identified (33%)
Twin
Twin-tower precinct with signature sky bridge

Modern. Well-built. Recently delivered. And 33% underinsured. The Sapphire by the Gardens assessment is a reminder that even world-class assets carry hidden exposure when their engineering complexity isn’t properly accounted for.

The Brief

MCG was engaged to complete a precinct-wide Insurance Replacement Cost assessment for Sapphire by the Gardens — a landmark twin-tower development at 560 Lonsdale Street and 308 Exhibition Street, Melbourne. This world-class asset features luxury residential towers, the Shangri-La Hotel, and a signature sky bridge connecting the two towers at height.

The assessment needed to capture not just the towers themselves, but the full complexity of a mixed-use precinct where luxury residential, five-star hotel, and signature engineering all coexist in a single valuation framework.

The Challenge

High-rise precincts with signature engineering elements are routinely undervalued in standard insurance models. The sky bridge connecting the Sapphire towers is a case in point: a highly specialised piece of structural engineering, constructed at significant height, with a replacement cost that standard benchmarks dramatically understate. The same applies to the cost intensity of premium high-rise construction more broadly — where structural complexity, vertical logistics, and premium finishes compound well beyond what flat-rate models predict.

The previously insured value of approximately $276M appeared defensible without detailed analysis. It was only through a rigorous, element-by-element assessment that the true scale of the gap became apparent.

“A 33% underinsurance gap on a recently delivered, world-class asset — driven largely by the sky bridge and the true cost of high-rise construction at this standard.”

Our Approach

MCG assessed the full precinct across both towers, treating the residential, hotel, and sky bridge components as distinct elements with their own engineering characteristics and cost profiles. High-rise construction premiums, specialised vertical logistics, and premium finishes were applied at current Melbourne market rates rather than blended benchmarks.

The sky bridge received particular attention — modelled as the specialised structural engineering it is, rather than being absorbed into a general building rate that would have dramatically understated its replacement cost.

The Outcome

An assessed replacement cost exceeding $412,450,000 — identifying a 33% underinsurance gap of approximately $136 million against the previously insured value of ~$276M. The outcome gives the asset owner a fully defensible insurance position that accurately reflects the true cost of replacing one of Melbourne’s most sophisticated developments.

Ready to Maximise Your Property Returns?

Get a free, no-obligation quote from MCG Quantity Surveyors. Tax depreciation schedules, insurance assessments, and construction estimating.