My 2023 Outlook

Oh my gosh, is that the time already? I just looked up from my harried work desk and realised…. 2022 is coming to an end!

It feels like this year has progressed far faster than the previous few. Perhaps it’s the PTSD of pandemic shutdowns when we had too much time on our hands. Now it’s all work fast, hit targets and don’t take a backward step because you never know what the future might bring!

Anyway, with 2023 coming down the turnpike, I want to share my thoughts on the year ahead. I feel a bit like a lousy property market Santa Claus, not so much delivering on your wishes, but rather saying you had better not cry because this is simply the way things are.

On that cheery note, here are my expectations about 2023’s property markets.

 

The big picture

First up, some sobering news. I expect property values more broadly to continue softening through until the middle of 2023. Confidence among buyers isn’t great at present so they will remain cautious about making offers and moving forward on purchases.

Of course, all eyes will be on inflation to see how effective the interest rate rises have been. Moves to increase the cash rate in 2022 will reveal their full impact in the 2023 numbers. While our domestic inflation figure remains elevated, there are signs that costs are pulling back overseas – so that’s some good news at least.

Market sentiment is likely to turn positive very quickly once the RBA suggests potential interest rate cuts in the future (probably somewhere towards the end of 2023 based on current metrics). Investors with their fingers on the pulse will do well if they acquire property before that occurs.

Underlying fundamentals are suggesting to me that property values will rise again come late 2023/early 2024.

 

The influences

I’m not talking about my incredible Instagram and Tik Tok accounts. That would be influencers, not influences.

Here are some key levers that I believe will drive property market direction in 2023.

The first is international immigration which should ramp up demand for housing. Look at the prime minister’s bullish announcement during the Jobs and Skills Summit in 2022 and you’ll get the idea. Add to that figure the natural egress from students, long-stay holiday makers and family immigrants, and we could potentially see 180,000 to 200,000 more people coming to our shores each year.

Now, consider the decrease in construction activity that we’ve seen going into the end of this year. Supply of new housing is tightening as a result.

Guess what happens when demand rises and supply falls? That’s right – values increase.

We’re already under tight accommodation conditions. We’ve seen extreme levels of rental vacancy in 2022 particularly in and around capital city CBDs. I’d expect tenants in these locations who’re looking for a rental will continue to struggle .

I also believe affordability will be a key market driver this year. We’ve seen huge interstate migration to more affordable locations such as south-east Queensland and with borrowing capacities eroded by interest rate and serviceability changes, I’d expect a lot of investor interest to shift from Sydney and Melbourne to other capitals and regional centres.

 

Piquing my interest

I think there are a couple of key sectors worth watching this year.

Commercial property will continue to steam along in 2023. The yield-chasing investor is well and truly looking at assets which offset the cost of rising interest rates. Well-chosen commercial is delivering this to its owners.

In the residential space, cash flow properties such as dual living, duplex, communal living and boarding houses will grow in popularity too.

As I mentioned, housing affordability – be it buying or renting – will continue to be the hot-button topic. Government moves to boost housing supply via public-private partnerships sound promising, but the logistics will be challenging. Particularly because construction costs and demand for contractors remain strong (despite a recent slowing in activity). In short, I don’t expect a silver-bullet solution coming from any government.

What I hope will be a surprise this year is politicians leaning away from anti-landlord legislation and towards incentivising mum-and-dad investors. This would seem like a no-brainer way to help boost rental supply. My hope is they see the light and start engaging more with investors to help bring about a solution.

 

My final takeaways

So, looking at the year ahead, I think among the most surprising things is that despite some doom and gloom predictions about the economy and property markets, the fundamentals remain impressive. We’ve got a relatively robust economy at the moment, growing wages, low unemployment, record low rental vacancies, immigration set to rise and all while most homeowners are well ahead on their mortgages.

Heading into early 2023, there will be great buying opportunities in the property market, so for those with the available funds and cashflow, now presents a good time to get active.

Is This The Best Investment Property Ever?

If we were to put a percentage value on it, the selection of an individual city will generally account for approximately 80 percent of the performance outcome from a property investment decision. The other 20 percent is the specific property selection. In the majority of cases, property investors have the order of importance out of whack and focus 80 percent of their energy on the later.

One of several driving forces behind this back-the-front decision-making process is a taxation that some investors have with new (or near-new) properties. They prioritise high taxation benefits
(depreciation) and they have a perception of ‘new’ meaning limited maintenance expenses.
To shed some light on this matter, we’ve reached out to one of Australia’s most respected quantity surveyors and depreciation experts, MCG Quantity Surveyors. Managing Director, Mike Mortlock, was kind enough to share the below insights with Propertyology.

Mike said, a question that I get asked quite often is ‘… I’m about to invest and want to know which investment property will give me the best tax depreciation deductions…’

Depreciation is a taxation benefit, not a property investment strategy. I’m frequently asked by well-meaning investors: ‘what is the best property to buy for depreciation deductions’. There are two key ingredients for maximum depreciation deductions:

1. A high construction cost per square metre, with a high standard of finish; and
2. Extensive common areas with a long list of amenities.

As for what sort of investment best fits that description… It would most likely be a 1-bed apartment in a block of say 600.

The block would be a high rise of 30+ levels, include 8 levels of basements and a marbled and extensively furnished foyer. Multiple swimming pools, a gym packed with equipment, 6-lifts and a cinema would also be ideal.
Apartments typically cost more per square metre, because there’s less open space per square metre than a house and more wet areas.
Highrise tend to cost more to build, as there are extra construction costs involved for traffic management, hoarding, cranes, scaffolding and the list goes on.
As for extensive common areas, when you buy an apartment in a block of 600, you will roughly own one-six-hundredth of the common areas (1/600).
In the experience of MCG Quantity Surveyors, one lift in a high-rise building generally costs $1 million or more, they have a 30-year effective life and depreciate at 6.67 percent per year.
If you owned 1/600 of a building with 6-lifts worth a combined $6 million, you’d be able to claim $667 in year one – just on the lifts!
That’s the upside.
The downside? You’re paying to maintain them, too. And the strata fees will blow the enamel off your teeth!
When expressed as a share of the purchase price, apartments are great for taxation deductions, because the land component is small.
You’ve probably heard the adage ‘buildings depreciate and land appreciates’?
Land is a non-depreciable asset so if you’re wanting to maximise your deductions, ideally you buy as little of it as you can.

Depreciation can be a curious thing and it differs starkly from ‘market value’.
Consider two apartments in a building that are identical in size and quality. One has a view of Sydney harbour, the other overlooks a carpark. The purchase price could differ by hundreds of thousands, but the deductions won’t.
I remember a repeat client purchasing an $8 million house in Vaucluse as an investment, only for me to tell him that there were not enough deductions to justify him paying me for a depreciation schedule. It was built in the 1960s and had NEVER been touched!
Getting back to the person that asked me ‘what to buy for maximum deductions?’
After I explain the type of property, in the massive block, with all the common property, the response I then generally get is “But Mike, that sounds like a terrible investment!”
And you know what? History has proven that to be true.

Related article: House versus apartment performance

In fact, I did a quick Google search and found an article on the places in Sydney you can buy in 2022 for than less 2016 prices. What those suburbs all have in common is a high proportion of high-rise units. Locations such as North Ryde, Haymarket, Ultimo, Parramatta & Haymarket. Each major city has their own version of these suburbs.
All properties will likely have some depreciation deductions available, and you really MUST get in touch with your friendly quantity surveyor for a free estimate as part of the process.

But please remember that, whilst nobody likes paying tax, nobody likes losing money either – those two things can certainly go hand in hand.

I use this example in the hope of illustrating that deprecation is a bonus, never a strategy.

I want people to understand that using depreciation as a primary investment strategy is like trying to win a weight loss competition by cutting your arms and legs off.
Sure, you’ll get some impressive results, but is it going to be worth it in the long run?

CASE STUDY
In the middle of the (then) Sydney and Melbourne property boom in 2014, the widespread consensus of the Australian public and all of the so-called ‘experts’ was that Brisbane would be the next city to boom.
Propertyology Managing Director, Simon Pressley, lives in Brisbane so, given the confirmation bias within all humans, it would have been very easy for Simon to justify buying an investment property in his hometown.

For the small outlay of $280,000, Simon could have purchased a brand new, 1-bedroom apartment, just 2-kilometre from the Brisbane CBD, a major university precinct and city’s largest hospital. Depreciation deductions would have been significant.
Brisbane’s property market ended up being flat for much of the 8-years post-2014 and, even with the recent COVID boom, an apartment like the one in question would today be valued at only 15 percent more than the initial purchase price.
Instead, Simon used $280,000 to purchase the 3-bedroom house featured in photos in this blog. It happened to be 104-years old (that’s not a typo).
8-years later, the property is worth $650,000 (130 percent capital growth).
Simon has not spent any money on renovations, yet the rental income has increased significantly. The current $28,000 annual rental income is $12,000 more than annual expenses.

Critical to vastly different outcomes of the two aforementioned scenarios was Simon not obsessing about the age of the property he invested in and, most importantly, not paying attention to what others called ‘research’ (aka ‘Group Think’). His own objective analysis of the fundamentals of each of Australia’s 400 individual townships pointed to Hobart.
With great understanding that capital growth makes a significantly bigger contribution to future retirement lifestyles than tax deductions, instead of fixating on real estate ‘birth certificates’ he focused on selecting a low maintenance, structurally sound house in a middle-ring pocket where his research indicated opportunity.

As a professional property investor, Simon is adamant that city selection is the most important decision for property investment performance. There are a few key priorities for selecting the right property, but ‘age’ is not one of them. Simon encourages investors to purchase a depreciation schedule for every property, regardless of when it was built.

Propertyology are national buyer’s agents and Australia’s premier property market analyst. Every capital city and every non-capital city, Propertyology analyse fundamentals in every market, every day. We use this valuable research to help everyday Aussies to invest in strategically-chosen locations (literally) all over Australia. Like to know more? Contact us hereHere’s how we combine our thought-leading research with Propertyology’s award-winning buyer’s agency services.

 

Originally posted By Propertyology Head of Research and REIA Hall of Famer, Simon Pressley (https://www.propertyology.com.au/author/simon/):

https://www.propertyology.com.au/is-this-the-best-investment-property-ever/

Why Australia is facing a ‘devastating insurance crisis’ this summer

MCG Quantity Surveyors, which has offices in Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Newcastle, Adelaide, Perth and Canberra, said that a combination of factors could lead to “one of most financially devastating” summers in recent history.

“What’s occurred with the floods in Victoria looks like an unsettling precursor for the summer ahead,” MCG Quantity Surveyors director Marty Sadlier said.

“I’m incredibly concerned this year’s La Nina will financially devastate a huge number of homeowners and investors who are substantially under insured.

“The last time a triple dip La Nina occurred was more than two decades ago from 1998 until 2001.

“Because we’ve already had two wet summers, dam catchments are up and water tables are high, so flood events this year will be more likely.

“We’re also still recovering financially from the previous two years of flooding which resulted in billions of dollars of damage throughout the nation.

“Along with the loss of life and property, these events have exacerbated other elements that will make things difficult.”

The Bureau of Meteorology officially declared that a third La Nina was underway on September 13, adding that above average rainfall was likely for eastern Australia during spring and summer.

A month later, the bureau’s long range forecast further warned of an increased risk of widespread flooding and an above average number of cyclones, with the potential for an earlier than normal tropical storm.

Since then, a relentless train of weather systems has delivered rain, storms and flooding to huge parts of the east coast, with parts of Victoria still under water.

“Residents and communities living on or near any rivers, creeks and streams or in low lying areas, especially in southern Queensland, much of inland NSW, Victoria and northern Tasmania are advised to stay up to date with the latest forecast and warnings,” a media release warned on Monday as more wild weather was forecast later this week.

To date, the insurance bill from the wild weather that slammed southeast Queensland and NSW in February and early March has hit a staggering $5.45 billion, with just over half of the 234,000 claims now closed, according to the Insurance Council of Australia.

It is the costliest flood in Australia’s history, and the fifth most costly disaster after the Sydney Hailstorm (1999), Cyclone Tracey (1974), Cyclone Dinah (1967) and the Newcastle Earthquake (1989).

But Mr Sadlier warned that a triple whammy of factors could make any widespread natural disaster this summer “financially devastating”, adding that every property owner should be checking their insurance coverage and getting their homes ready now.

RISING CONSTRUCTION COSTS

“Rising construction costs throughout the past two years means any insurance value assessments from 12 months ago could be redundant,” he said.

“Repairs to previously flooded property has seen the demand for labour and materials continue to skyrocket.

“If the heavy rains cause more widespread flooding again this year, expect to see our already strained construction industry put under further stress.”

Mr Sadlier said the fallout of such a scenario would be “dramatic” as construction costs were already at new highs, with timber going up by about 21 per cent and steel around 42 per cent.

UNDERINSURANCE

“Australia’s property owners are already substantially underinsured,” Mr Sadlier said, adding that research in 2020 suggested that a whopping 83 per cent of Australians were underinsured.

“Then in 2021, the Australian Bureau of Statistics noted that 2.44 million Australian households had no house and contents insurance – that’s 23 per cent of all Australian homes.

“In reality, I believe over 90 per cent of properties in Australia are not carrying adequate insurance.”

Mr Sadlier said many owners did not carry out proper assessments of their property’s replacement costs each year, with most just adding a “little extra to last year’s guesstimate”.

“Worse still are those who rely solely on online calculators to help them assess their insurance values,” he said, adding that online calculators failed to take into account consultants’ fees, demolition and forecast building cost inflation, allowances for site works, retaining walls, mature landscaping and additional works.

“These wildly inaccurate tools are causing major headaches for those who thought they were adequately insured.”

A number of flood affected houses across Brisbane have just been gutted and put up for sale

THE RENTAL CRISIS

Australia is in the grips of a rental crisis, with many regions recording vacancy levels below 1 per cent.

On the east coast, Sydney’s vacancy rate in September was 1.3 per cent, Brisbane was 0.7 per cent and Melbourne was 1.4 per cent.

It is even tighter in lifestyle regions that have seen significant interstate migration such as the Gold Coast and Cairns (0.5%) and the Sunshine Coast (0.7%), according to SQM Research.

“Floods will have massive implications on construction programs, add continuous strain to the supply of building materials and increase upward pressure on construction costs,” Mr Sadlier said.

“This means people will be displaced for longer periods of time and will need alternative shelter.

“A big flood would only add more demand to the rental market while also removing a swathe of supply.

“You can see how that equation will cause the currently dire rental situation to become even worse.”

Mr Sadlier said that the only thing Aussies could do was to ensure they were “financially storm ready”.

“Make sure your insurance is up to date and that it delivers comprehensive coverage,” he said.

“Most important of all is to confirm you have an updated insurance value estimate for your home that has been prepared by a qualified professional.

“This is the only way to guarantee you have adequate coverage as a safety net against the weather.”

 

Originally published as Why Australia is facing a ‘devastating insurance crisis’ this summer By Samantha Healy, The Courier Mail

Reference: https://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/regional/why-australia-is-facing-a-devastating-insurance-crisis-this-summer/news-story/

Is the Lucky Country Losing It’s Mojo?

Four Corners’ episode last week “No place to call home – the new face of homelessness in Australia” made for sombre viewing.

It followed the stories of hard-working young Australians, primarily single mothers, as they desperately try to find even the most basic accommodation for their families in regional towns.

They talk of applying for hundreds of properties, only to be in competition with dozens of other applicants, and to face the demoralizing news that they were yet again unsuccessful.

In seaside centres such as Coffs Harbour, the shortage of affordable accommodation has been exacerbated by an influx of people from Sydney and Melbourne.

Office workers previously bound to CBD locations, have discovered a new sense of freedom. As we emerge from COVID, the evolution of the work environment for some means all they need is internet access to login to their work from anywhere.

It’s easy to see why the lure of a sea-change or tree-change has been too tempting to resist, but it’s impact on the rental market has had repercussions for many.

It’s not just the WFH transition that’s caused the disequilibrium.

Australia is caught in a perfect storm of rising interest rates, escalating costs of materials, global economic uncertainty, oil price volatility and more.

 

 

 

 

The rental crisis in Australia

The rental crisis has not been caused by COVID, but the pandemic has definitely made it worse.

Already a challenging situation in 2019, the national rental vacancy rates fell to 0.9% in August 2022, according to SQM research, the lowest rate since 2006. This is well below the 3% margin which is considered to represent a healthy market balance.

The plummeting vacancy rates have been brought about by many factors:

  • Australians returning from overseas during COVID and moving back into properties (somewhat offset by people leaving our shores to return to their own homes during COVID);

 

  • Lack of housing supply and delays in new builds as construction companies grapple with rising costs of materials and labour;

 

  • Landlords turning their properties into short term rentals and removing them from the rental pool;

 

  • Changing lifestyles, with “knowledge workers” capitalizing on the ability to work from anywhere and leaving behind the hustle and density of capital city living – seeking a seachange or a treechange;

 

  • Higher construction costs and difficulties getting contractors;

 

  • Interest rates are increasing, pushing rents up to cover mortgage payments;

 

 

  • Some properties are still not repaired from the floods early in 2022, even as Australia braces for a third season of La Nina.

 

The rental crisis is not isolated to regional towns either.

Corelogic’s quarterly rental review showed the national rental index increased 0.9% in the month to June and 2.9% over the June quarter.

“Rents are 9.1% higher across capital cities and are up 10.8% in regional cities compared with June 2021. Canberra remained the country’s most expensive rental market, with the typical home renting for $690 per week, ahead of Sydney which recorded a median rental value of $643 per week, and Darwin at $565 per week.”2

While this appears to be good news for Landlords burdened with increasing mortgage payments, the disconnect between demand and supply in affordable housing is a problem that needs addressing.

 

The Laptop Line

There’s a new phrase being bandied about over the past week or so.

The Laptop Line divides those in inner cities in largely white collar jobs that are able to work from home, against the balance of people who have to show up to a place of work in order to do their jobs.

Think police, teachers, construction workers, nurses, among others.

These professions are integral to the fabric of our cities and towns.

And oftentimes they can least afford to live close to work.

This isn’t the first time this has happened, albeit for different reasons.

Towns that benefited from rising property prices during the various mining booms of the 90’s and 2000’s, also experienced the challenge of shortages of essential workers who couldn’t afford the living costs brought about by skyrocketing rents.

This isn’t just a property problem, it’s a society issue.

 

Is WFH here to stay?

The “working from home” phenomena is a hot topic in the media and on platforms such as LinkedIn.

Everyone from the CEOs of major property companies to Hamish McDonald on the Project has a view on the subject, and they’re not afraid to share it.

Whatever your perspective, it does seem set to stay in some form or another, most likely in a hybrid form of flexible working.

If the reality is that workers need to front up to their place of work 1-2 days a week as has been suggested, this may go some way to alleviate the pressure on rents in towns such as Coffs Harbour.

But it will take time to play out and it doesn’t help those looking for properties to rent right now.

 

The supply side

On the supply side the picture is not much prettier, with recent reports that lending for new homes continues to slow.

The ABS recently released the Lending to Households and Business data for August 2022, showing a 3.4% decline in the total value of housing loans, brought about largely by the economic tightening we’re currently experiencing.

“The decline in August brings the value of housing loans to its lowest level in almost two years, down by 15.4 per cent on three months earlier,” according to Tom Devitt, an economist with HIA, the Housing Industry Association.3

“The number of loans for the construction or purchase of new homes also declined by 4.5 per cent in August, to its lowest level since March 2020 – the first month of the pandemic in Australia. This is consistent with other leading indicators, such as HIA’s New Home Sales Survey, showing new home sales dropped in July and August in response to higher interest rates.”

So if property owners and developers are faced with tightening credit restrictions and hurdles to financing, or are loathe to take out building loans in the face of higher interest rates, where does this leave our housing supply pipeline?

This combined with rising costs of materials and lack of available contractors, and construction firms struggling to stay solvent, suggests the housing demand/supply equation is under even further threat if nothing changes.

 

The way forward

If the RBA’s intent in increasing interest rates is to put the brakes on an overheated property market and halt inflation, then it appears to be having an impact.

But with so many levers at play at both a micro and macro level, the fallout is being felt at all levels of the economy.

The Federal and State Governments are not unaware of the issues, with QLD State Government holding a Housing Summit in October this year and the topics being hotly debated.

We need to find solutions for affordable housing, as well as support for a struggling construction sector.

Levers such as incentives for developers to include higher ratios of affordable housing in developments and forums that place the many issues of housing and living costs front and centre of national policy are required.

Property owners and developers have a critical role to play in addressing the imbalance between supply and demand, but they cannot be expected to fix the problem in isolation.

If ever there was a time to be prudent in making decisions, it’s now.

Whether you call it luck or opportunity, Australia is still a great place to be for many, and we need to make sure it stays that way for every single one of us.

As a nation, we might have temporarily lost our mojo, but with a team effort, we can get it back.

 

MCG Quantity Surveyors are committed to playing their part in ensuring a prosperous and safe Australia for all.

We can help developers and home owners ensure they are making the best decisions when it comes to feasibilities and cost estimates, prior to embarking on projects, and assist with tax depreciation schedules to get the most out of any development or purchase.

Contact us now for an obligation free quote on 1300 795 170 or go to our website mcgqs.com.au for more information.

 

 

References

 1  “No place to call home – The new face of homelessness in Australia”  3 October 2022 <abc.net.au/4corners>

2 Rents rise at fastest rate in 14 years across Australia” July 2022  <theguardian.com>

3  “Lending to build a new home continues to slow”  September 2022 <HIA.com.au>

The political idiocy surrounding Aussie housing

Ask those who know me, and most would say I’m not prone to emotional outbursts. Sure, half a bottle of red and a robust debate on sports cars or the world’s greatest guitar player will bring out my strident fervour, but I know my limits.

However, there’s one issue that’s come to the fore that I cannot stomach and I think it’s high time to deliver a verdict on exactly what’s wrong and how I’d fix it.

I am talking about the political idiocy in discussions surrounding Australia’s rental crisis.

 

Who started the fire?

I’ve been collating information and expert opinions from a range of reliable sources and there’s no doubt today’s rental crisis is founded on two pillars.

 

  1. Politics

We’ve seen a comprehensive disincentivising of property investment by politicians across all jurisdictions.

There’s been an insane amount of states-based legislative change to tenancy laws and these amendments have been wholeheartedly weighted in favour of tenants.

Victoria introduced a raft of new rules in 2021 that included allowing tenants to modify the home and stricter terms around ending a tenancy. New South Wales tenancy laws in 2020 restrict rent increases to one per year and allow for minor alterations by the tenant. Then there’s Queensland which is currently undergoing its first round of legislative changes with relaxations for tenants wanting pets and making modifications to the home as well.

While much of this may sound minor, it demonstrates a gradual erosion of a landlord’s control over their valuable asset.
But even worse is that some people think legislators should go further. During a historic rent crisis, tenants’ unions and minor-party members are pushing for even more rigorous changes to disenfranchise landlords.

In Queensland, for example, the Greens want to freeze rents for two years then only allow two per cent annual increases. They are effectively removing the free market from the equation and looking to “socialise” assets owned by mum-and-dad investors. Fortunately, and for now, the Labor party in Queensland has ruled out any such change.

Mind you, the Queensland government’s recent attempt to change land tax laws shows they’re not above bad policy themselves. The amendments, which would have seen investment property in other states and territories being used as part of Queensland’s land tax assessments, were diabolical. Fortunately, because of political backlash and campaigning by investor advocates, the plan was shelved.

Yes, the vilification of investors has been relentless.

In the last two federal elections, they have been a supposed “soft target” for some politicians. It was perhaps Bill Shorten’s unrelenting attacks in 2019 that were the most divisive federally. His platform of abolishing negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions was designed to curry favour with Labor’s base. He, however, grossly underestimated the aspirations of the voting public. Landlords (and those who hope to one day be a landlord) came out in force and kicked Mr Shorten to the kerb in the “unlosable election”.

Even so, the most recent federal election also saw minor parties attack investors – constantly painting them as greedy, property-hoarding multi-millionaires. But ABS numbers disprove this fallacy. Of Australia’s 2.2 million investors, 85 per cent own two or less investment properties. Put another way, the vast majority simply want a little extra income in their retirement.

 

  1. Finance

Property investment requires its buyers to qualify for finance on reasonable terms, but that has become near impossible for many.

Findings from the Royal Commission into Banking and Finance resulted in tougher loan conditions for all borrowers, but none more so than investors.

Regulations were introduced to slow investor lending. Financiers applied a range of measures such as higher LVR thresholds and more rigorous and conservative financial assessment during the approval process.

And then there’s interest rates. Despite investors traditionally having far fewer defaults relative to owner-occupiers, banks continue to charge them higher interest rates.

Now they’re being hit with ongoing interest rate rises and increased serviceability buffers along with the rest of the public.

Buying a property and then finding the funds to hold it have become more and more challenging. It’s little wonder that investors have been fleeing the sector. Many saw the hot 2021 market as an opportunity to cash out, which has of course led to fewer rentals in the face of rising tenant demand.

So here we are. Investors have been battered, bruised and belted on all fronts. If I can put it bluntly, they’re sick of the bullshit and are walking away.

 

The fix

In my opinion there are two ways we can turn the market around and help all tenants find a home.

The first is to increase investment in government housing. Public housing accounts for around two to three percent of all rental stock at present. That’s a pittance of what’s needed.

Governments should instead be aiming to provide a minimum of 10 to 15 per cent rental housing. This would not only help secure affordable rentals for all Australians, but it’d also stimulate an array of industries across the economy from construction to general services.

The second move to end the rental crisis is simply this – stop belting investors and instead, start encouraging them. Favourable policies such as a reduced tax burden and financial incentives will incite participation.

At the very least, end all the anti-landlord rhetoric and policy implementation. All this does is encourage those with investable funds to find other ways they can grow their wealth outside of real estate.

Of course, being on the side of the investor is deemed politically unsavoury. Those in power are too afraid to say what must be said, which is that investors are a positive influence, not the big bad wolf they’re all too often painted to be.

Five Ways to Profit From Eco-Upgrading Your Investment Property

As the rain beats down on this Queen’s memorial public holiday, it seems a sign of things to come as we head into summer, bracing for yet another season impacted by La Nina, our third in as many years.

Spare a thought for all those that flooded in 2020 and 2021.

Some of them are still living in houses in a state of disrepair, waiting for builders and insurers to work through their backlog of work.

And it’s not just Australians that are suffering.

As we watch reports of floods in Pakistan and Italy, or typhoons in Japan, or mudslides in California, it’s hard to ignore the fact that catastrophic weather events are occurring with increasing regularity.

Combine that with the current economic uncertainty and rising interest rates, and it’s hard not to feel a bit despondent about it all.

But rather than sit back and wonder how it all came to this, there are ways to take a more proactive approach and consider ways in which we can maximise our investments and protect our financial future, and at the same time, reduce our footprint on the planet.

Mike Mortlock, managing director at MCG Quantity Surveyors, believes smart landlords who ‘go green’ on their investments are reaping financial rewards.

“The old trope is that you can either be a raging capitalist investor or an eco-warrior, but not both,” Mr Mortlock said.

“I beg to differ because there are ways improve your investment’s green credentials while boosting the rent and minimising your tax burden through cost write-offs and depreciation benefits.”

It was clear from the federal election results earlier this year that many Australians are increasingly concerned with climate change and voiced their support of greater commitment to net zero targets.

Eco-friendly and energy-rated design is taking on more importance and are now inherent in most building approvals. Not only do they reduce the impact on the planet, they ultimately result in lower running costs for tenants and depreciation benefits and greater tenant appeal for landlords.

Mr Mortlock outlined five moves property investors could make to help both the planet and their bank balance.

 

  1. Heating and cooling

 

Starting with arguably the biggest contributor to both residential carbon emissions and ongoing costs, air-conditioning and heating systems leave a heavy footprint on the planet through the high use of energy.

Not only that, we’ve just lived through a cold winter with extended below average temperatures, placing unprecedented demand on electricity suppliers and forcing regulators to order generators back into the market to avoid power shortages.

As the weather changes, so too does our reliance on heating and cooling.

But there are ways to modify our homes and investment properties to make them more efficient.

Mr Mortlock proposes insulation to roof and wall cavities as an excellent start. For investment properties, the works can be claimed as a capital works deduction and typically cost around $2000 to have your ceiling blanketed.

It might seem obvious, but the installation of ceiling fans is a relatively cheap option at a couple of hundred dollars a pop. Much more common in QLD, NT and north WA, they are a simple addition to get the air moving and reduce the impact on some of those sweltering summer days. If it costs less than $301, the outlay is fully depreciable on your next tax return.

Other options include window film and other design options to keep out the heat in summer. Tinting will generally cost between $50and $100 per square metre and is treated as a capital works deduction.

 

  1. Power generation

 

Solar systems are fast becoming a common inclusion in new builds and are easy to retrofit. Battery storage makes it easier to justify the cost, and while installation doesn’t come cheap at between $5,000 and $15,000 for a decent system, the merits can make it worth it.

Not only are they appealing to tenants due to electricity savings, you can also benefit from a tax depreciation rate of 10% per annum.

Less common, but equally advantageous if your investment is an acreage, are wind turbines which are a great source of energy. Costing around $2000 , turbines can also be depreciated at a rate of 10% per year under the diminishing value method.

 

  1. Water collection

 

The long-range weather forecast of ongoing rain this summer makes the inclusion of water tanks in this list a no-brainer. A staple in Aussie homes for decades, the capturing and reuse of tank water for toilets and washing machines is a simple and effective means of reducing excess water charges.

That keeps tenants happy, and can mean a rent boost for the right property.

And it’s good for the environment.

As at July 2019, rainwater tanks were listed by the ATO as a plant and equipment item. So not only can they be installed and plumbed into a home for well under $10,000, they can be claimed back on tax at a whopping rate of 40%, rather than the standard 2.5%.

 

  1. Future proofing for cars

 

It’s rare to drive into a public carpark these days and not see an electric vehicle charging station.

And with the Federal Government’s recent announcement to honour it’s election promise by  introducing incentives to make electric vehicles more affordable, it’s likely we’ll see the demand increasing.

Which means that sooner or later you’re going to need to fit out your garage with a car charger. Doing it sooner will no doubt appeal especially to inner city tenants who have adapted their vehicle usage and don’t have to contend with the challenges presented by regional travel.

According to Mr Mortlock, domestic car chargers cost around $750 to $1500 and will net you a 20% depreciation rate each year.

 

  1. Gardens a-growin’

 

There’s money to be saved by designing a garden that works with the natural environment. That means a low maintenance garden filled with mulch and native plants that don’t consume much water.

A landscaped garden might set you back up to $20,000 but you can claim some of it back through your tax return. Plants and turf won’t attract deductions, but hard landscaping such as retaining walls, paving, concreting and fencing will.

Not only that, it will make it much easier for tenants to maintain, and it will do it’s bit in converting back carbon emissions.

 

Where does MCG come in?

We love helping our clients make the most of their investments, and if that means contributing to a sustainable planet, that’s a win-win for us.

We pride ourselves on ensuring that our clients have the most up to date, thorough information to allow them to make smart investing decisions.

Our experienced Quantity Surveyors can provide comprehensive tax depreciation reports that maximise your investment dollar.

Contact us now for an obligation free quote on 1300 795 170 or go to our website mcgqs.com.au for more information.

 

‘Coinsurance’ or ‘Average Clause’ Explained and Case Study

Coinsurance Clause or Average Clause

An insurance policy for a property owner is accompanied by a detailed and complex contract that will contain clauses, provisions and responsibilities that are assigned to either the policy holder or the insurer.

One of these provisions is the coinsurance clause.

Coinsurance is quite often misunderstood and it inclusion in a policy can have astounding ramifications and financial exposure to the policy holder.

 

What is Coinsurance?

Coinsurance is also known as the Average Clause. It is a common clause contained in most Commercial Property Insurance Policies.

Coinsurance is quite commonly used within insurance policies covering buildings, equipment, business contents, inventory, and other property.

These policies insure your property for ‘Replacement Value’.

The clause generally ensures that policy holders carry an appropriate amount of insurance coverage and receive a fair premium for their insurance policy.

In the event that a policy holder fails to correctly insure their property for the full replacement value, then they are deemed to be ‘sharing’ the risk of the insured asset with the insurer.

The inclusion of the coinsurance clause is to encourage clients and policy holders to make sure they have a sum insured that is adequate to obtain the maximum protection from the policy.

In the event that a policy holder does not have adequate insurance to cover the full replacement of the property (intentional or unintentional), the insured person will be required to pay a share of the payment made against a claim.

For this reason, it is extremely important that your Sum Insured reflects the true replacement cost of your property/items.

Most policies allow a sum insured that is within 80% of the replacement value without the clause coming into effect. It does change from policy to policy, so it is best to actually understand what the percentage is within the insurance policy, and better still, avoid this all together by insuring it for the correct sum.

Most coinsurance clauses require policyholders to insure to 80, 90, or 100% of a property’s actual value. For instance, a building valued at $1,000,000 replacement value with a coinsurance clause of 90% must be insured for no less than $900,000. The same building with an 80% coinsurance clause must be insured for no less than $800,000.

If the sum insured is below the 80% then it is deemed the policy holder is under insuring and ‘average’ is applied.

If the policy holder chooses to insure the building for less than $800,000, they agree to retain part of the risk with the insurance company.

Put simply, the % of your sum insured as it relates to the Replacement Value is applied. The effect of this can be catastrophic to any business.

 

How the Coinsurance Formula Works

The coinsurance formula is calculated by dividing the actual amount of coverage on the property by the amount that should have been carried for the replacement value.

So, if you have insured your property for $750,000 and it should have been $1,000,000, then you are insured for 75% of its value.

Current Insured Value    ÷             Actual Real Value             =             Your Insured %

$750,000                       ÷                 $1,000,000                =                                75%

Then, multiply this amount by the amount of the loss, and this will give you the amount of the reimbursement.

Coinsurance does not apply to total loss claims only, it will apply to partial damage as well.

If the above-mentioned property of $1,000,000 suffered roof damage and a new roof was required then the policy holder would submit a claim.

The formula to determine the recovery is based on the property’s replacement value at the time of loss. If the replacement amount is less than the coinsurance percentage, a penalty is applied, reducing the claim payment.

For example, a policyholder has $750,000 of property insurance and a storm causes $200,000 in roof damages.

The claim is calculated by dividing the amount of insurance purchased ($750,000) by the value at time of loss ($1,000,000). This factor (75 per cent) is multiplied by the amount of the loss ($200,000).

 

Amount of Loss Value    x              Insured Percentage %    =             Your Payment Value

$200,000                      x                            75%                   =                             $150,000

 

In this example, the policyholder would receive $150,000 (less any deductible) for a $200,000 claim.

 

How can you remove the Coinsurance Clause

The coinsurance clause can be “suspended” for the term of the policy by adding an agreed or stated amount endorsement, or by the inclusion of a Certified Quantity Surveyors report.

This is a provision where the insurer and the insured agree to an amount of insurance and the coinsurance clause will not apply to a loss.

 

Coinsurance Clause Case Study

So an example of a case study of when someone has been underinsured and you’re going to have a coinsurance problem. The serial offender in these cases is usually regional pubs or hotels. What tends to happen is a be in the family for a long period of time, and the costs aren’t increased to recover the replacement costs over that time. And you have a longevity issue whether they’ve been for a long time under insurance. The other issue you’ll have there is, is that there’s a big difference between what you buy something for and what the cost of something will be to replace.

So for example, using that same case study of a regional pub, in a lot of cases, what will happen you’ll be in a small country town, and it will be quite a big pub and maybe a two storey timber pub on a corner with a big veranda, or the same scenario works well with a two or three storey brick pub as well.

The issue is that when you buy a pub for say $800,000 or $1,000,000 dollars, you may really only be buying the ground floor pub component in terms of value.

In many cases, these country towns have receded over the years. They don’t have the big workforce and transit workforce through the railways. Many of these pubs had a Chinese restaurant as an example for both takeaway food and pub food.

The commercial kitchen isn’t being used anymore, the big dining hall isn’t being used anymore and is really a large storage room.

Likewise, the second story part of the pub, which is usually accommodation and mixture of the caretakers accommodation or ‘to rent accommodation’, have not been unused for decades.

Doors are screwed shut and quite derelict. So what you’re actually buy is a ground floor pub

In many cases the owners of these pubs would note that should the pub be destroyed, they would only rebuild a ground floor pub and not worry about rebuilding the areas of the pub that are no longer used (in this instance, the restaurant and accommodation component).

However when we look at determining the replacement costs to rebuild this brick pub or timber federation pub in today’s market, we have to rebuild it with all the restaurant facilities and accommodation.

A purchase price of a $1,000,000 pub may well actually be a construction cost to build of closer to $2,500,000.

If the policy holder does not insure the pub for the replacement value, then they will be considered a coinsurer and trigger coinsurance clauses.

 

In this example it would look like this.

 

Total Loss Claim

Current Insured Value    ÷             Actual Real Value             =             Your Insured %

$800,000                      ÷                  $2,500,000               =                              32%

 

 

Amount of Loss Value    x              Insured Percentage %    =             Your Payment Value

$800,000                     x                         32%                      =                             $256,000

 

In this example, the policyholder would receive $256,000 (less any deductible) for a total loss.

 

Partial Loss Claim

Let’s assume a fire destroys part of the bar and kitchen and it will cost $78,000 to fix.

 

Current Insured Value    ÷             Actual Real Value             =             Your Insured %

$800,000                      ÷                $2,500,000                 =                             32%

 

 

Amount of Loss Value            x              Insured Percentage %            =             Your Payment Value

$78,000                                 x                        32%                              =                             $24,960

 

In this example, the policyholder would receive $24,960 (less any deductible) for repairs.

There is a disconnect between what policy holder wants to insure it for and what they should insure it for.

5 ways to profit from ‘going green’ on your investment property

By Zarah Mae Torrazo

 

An expert is debunking the misconception that an eco-friendly investment property can’t produce significant financial rewards.

 

Managing director of MCG Quantity Surveyors Mike Mortlock said that it’s time for investors to do away with the trope that one can be a capitalist investor or an eco-warrior — but not both.

“I beg to differ because there are ways to improve your investment’s green credentials while boosting the rent and minimising your tax burden through cost write-offs and depreciation benefits,” he stated.

The expert noted that landlords and property investors should take initiative to “go green” after Aussie voters expressed their support for climate change action at the federal election this year.

“We have reached a point where the public values eco-friendly moves designed to help address climate action. ‘Think global, act local’ as the saying goes,” he said.

Mr Mortlock said that this initiative now extends to housing, highlighting that energy-rated designs are now a basic and necessary part of building approvals.

Aside from being environmentally friendly, he explained how having a “green” investment property can be financially beneficial to investors. “Energy saving measures in investment properties result in more tenant appeal — so, higher rents — lower running costs, depreciation benefits and a cleaner planet.”

With this, Mr Mortlock has enumerated five moves that property investors can make that could both help the planet and an investor’s bank account:

1. Heating and cooling

Mr Mortlock said that warming and cooling systems (e.g. air-conditioning systems and high-energy heaters) are proven to be major carbon emitters — which have detrimental effects on the planet.

But he offered that there are ways to reduce your property’s carbon footprint.

“Insulation to roof and wall cavities is an excellent start. For around $2,000, you can have your ceiling blanketed and this can be claimed as a capital works deduction,” he stated.

If the hefty price tag on insulation is daunting, Mr Mortlock recommended less expensive solutions. “The installation of a ceiling fan helps too, and if it costs less than $301, the outlay is fully depreciable on your next tax return.

“Then there’s window film which can keep out the heat in summer. A window tint will set you back between $50 and $100 per square metre in most instances and is a capital works deduction,” he said.

2. Power generation 

Going off-grid is becoming highly appealing to most investors, as houses linked to the grid are required to cough up a flat supply charge, regardless of usage.

Mr Mortlock advised investors looking to go off-grid that there are ways to create independent energy sources on a small suburban block.

For starters, he recommended looking into solar power systems and battery storage, which are easy retrofits.

“While not cheap — a decent system installed will cost between $5,000 and $15,000 — they can be worth it. Apart from being appealing to tenants, installing solar allows you to depreciate its cost by 10 per cent per year under the diminishing value (DV) method,” he explained.

If the property has extra acreage, Mr Mortlock said that investors could evaluate the feasibility of installing a wind turbine.

“A wind turbine costing around $2,000 can generate formidable power. Best of all, depreciation benefits based on an effective life of 20 years gives you another 10 per cent per year via the DV method,” he said.

3. Water collection

Mr Mortlock also directed investors looking to become eco-warriors to utilise water tanks in the properties, which have been common in Australian homes for decades.

He said using such water for toilets and washing machines “makes sense” from an investor perspective, as they can keep the possibility of tenants having to pay excess water charges to a minimum.

“This can mean a rent boost for the right property,” he said.

“Water tanks can be installed and plumbed into a home for well under $10,000 and as at July 2019, rainwater tanks were listed by the ATO as a plant and equipment item. This means that rather than a 2.5 per cent deduction, you get a whopping 40 per cent rate of claim.”

4. Futureproofing for cars

There is no doubt the future will be full of electric cars, Mr Morton stated, and advised investors to consider fitting garages with a car charger.

He noted that this would strongly appeal to energy-efficient car owners. “This would appeal particularly to tenants in the inner city who are keen to keep their Teslas topped up.

“Domestic car chargers cost around $750 to $1,500 and I’d expect eventually we’ll see them going into properties as regularly as water tanks. In the meantime, vehicle chargers will net you a 20 per cent depreciation rate each year,” Mr Morton said.

5. Sensible, eco-friendly landscaping 

Lastly, Mr Mortlock said landscaping with mulching and native plants could be a cost-efficient and environmentally sound choice.

“Natives are low maintenance plants that don’t consume much water. They also do their bit in converting back carbon emissions,” he said.

While a “thoughtfully” designed landscape might cost an investor around $10,000 to $20,000, Mr Mortlock offered that part of it can be claimed back through tax return.

“Things such as plants and turf won’t attract any deductions, but hard landscaping such as retaining walls, paving, concreting and fencing will,” he stated.

 

Reference: https://www.smartpropertyinvestment.com.au/property-management/24066-5-ways-to-profit-from-going-green-on-your-investment-property 

How to Make Sure Your Sinking Fund Won’t End Up Sinking You

The term Sinking Fund conjures up all sorts of negative connotations.

Maybe because it sounds like something is sinking?

Or perhaps due to the similar wording to sunk costs – ie costs that are already incurred.

In reality though, it simply describes funds put aside to cover future expenses that are likely to arise, or replace an asset that has depreciated beyond it’s useful life.

In its simplest form, the MacMillan Dictionary describes a Sinking Fund as “money saved to pay for something later”.

It can be used for all sorts of expenses, although is most commonly used in relation to Government Bonds, or by Body Corporates.

If you’re in the market for an apartment or any form of strata property, the term ‘Sinking Fund’ is one you’d be wise to familiarize yourself with.

It’s one of the two types of funds or budgets that a body corporate is responsible for, and in to which you will be contributing each quarter (or as agreed) as part of your body corporate levy.

 

What is the body corporate responsible for?

Body corporates (or owners’ corporations) are legal entities designed to manage the operation and maintenance of the common property and shared areas within a strata titled development.

The Australian Tax Office categorises a body corporate as a not-for-profit organization, because it’s activities are funded entirely by its members, being the owners of each unit or apartment within the property.

Each year, annual budgets are set by the body corporate committee and voted on by the owners’ group, and levies are set as a proportion of the budget, based on owners entitlements (which may vary depending on size of apartments).

The body corporate is responsible for everything that falls outside each of the units (or lots). That is, anything that is not the responsibility of the individual owners.

 

Sinking fund vs administration fund

The body corporate is divided into two separate funds – the administration fund and the sinking fund.

The administration fund is exactly as it sounds – a fund set up for the ongoing maintenance (administration) of the complex.

Think of it as your transaction account, vs your rainy day savings account.

Out of the admin fund, the body corporate manager pays all of the day to day expenses – rates, water, electricity, gardening, general repairs and so on – relating to the common property.

The admin fund does not pay for capital works or capital expenses of the common property.

 

The sinking fund – and how to budget for it

That’s where the sinking fund comes in.

The intent of the sinking fund is to ensure that all capital replacements can be paid for as they fall due, without having to issue a special levy to the owners.

It also ensures that each owner contributes their share of the cost throughout their period of ownership, rather than the cost falling to the people who just happen to own the apartments at the time the repair falls due. This is particularly relevant for larger costs that may only be required every ten years or more.

Whilst the laws vary from state to state, by and large they dictate that a body corporate is required to have a detailed sinking fund forecast, with a future cashflow spanning a ten year period. This is a report of the building and common property, that states the projected lifecycle of each element and the anticipated timeframe for replacement.

Common examples of common area capital items include roof replacement, concrete driveways and paths, guttering replacement, building façade repairs, lift upgrades and pool facilities.

For example the building might be required to be repainted every ten years or the lifts may need an upgrade in the next three years.

The report is prepared by a Quantity Surveyor, who not only determines a simplified construction estimate for larger projects, or a replacement cost, but also generates a cashflow inclusive of inflation and likely cost increases based on market dynamics.

The forecast is generally required to be updated every five years, to take into account any changes in expected timeframes or any unforeseen costs.

I’ve worked with a lot of Property and Body Corporate Managers who think the best way to budget is to look at last years’ expenses and add 5%.

(This might get you by for the Administration Fund budget, although it would be preferable if a little more science went into those numbers as well.)

Luckily these managers are in the minority and most are lot more diligent.

Because the Sinking Fund is a effectively a savings fund for capital works, the type of costs it will cover from one year to the next will vary.

It’s important to engage the services of a qualified Quantity Surveyor to make sure you and your fellow owners don’t get caught out down the track.

 

Case in point – Mascot Towers

At the extreme end, take the case of Mascot Towers in Sydney.

You might remember the news reports in 2019 where the 132 residents of the property were evacuated after engineering reports came to light of extensive cracking and foundational issues that rendered the building unstable1.

The Bourke Street property was ten years old at the time, and concern was exacerbated by widely reported issues of a similar issues at Opal Tower only six months prior.

With the basic estimate for construction and repairs hitting seven figures, residents voted to raise a special levy of $7million for stage one of rectification, however at around $60,000 per unit, around 35% of the owners stated they were unable to afford the additional cost.2

Three years later, and the battle continues with owners and residents unable to occupy, lease or sell their units. Government assistance has been offered in the form of rental subsidies to cover alternative accommodation, however owners are still fighting for compensation and rectification of the building, with many facing significant financial burden as a result.

Fortunately cases such as this are rare but it does go to show the level of risk involved, and the scrutiny required thorough building inspections and comprehensive reports.

Having the right team in place can help.

 

Where does MCG come in?

As we all know, repairs and defects can develop at any time and as a building ages, it is inevitable that repairs and replacement of capital items will be required.

Careful planning is essential from the beginning to ensure that appropriate allowances for costs have been allowed for.

Many strata schemes, for a variety of reasons, find themselves in a position where money is desperately needed to pay for essential repairs or renovations but the bank account is empty.

MCG Quantity Surveyors have the extensive experience and knowledge required to ensure the sinking fund forecast includes sufficient allocations to cover all reasonably expected costs, whilst maintaining a realistic and feasible budget for owners.

We can calculate a simplified construction estimate for larger projects and determine the timeframe specific to each category of cost, providing a comprehensive cashflow for even the most complicated body corporate.

Contact us now for an obligation free quote on 1300 795 170 or go to our website mcgqs.com.au for more information.

 

References

 1 Merlehan, Adam  “Mascot Towers owners to pay $!m repair levy as residents remain shut out”  21 June 2019  <theguardian.com>

2 “Mascot Towers update – special levy” <sskb.com.au>

How Much Does It Cost to Build a Home?

How much does it cost per square metre to build a house in Australia?

To quote an overused phrase, you might well ask how long is a piece of string.

The short answer is, it depends.

What kind of house do you want to build? A sprawling family home or a compact single person dwelling?

Top of the range custom made fittings, or will budget finishes suffice?

There are many factors to take into account and the reality is it’s a bit of moving target at the moment. Costs are changing daily and there are some well documented pressures on the building industry from a number of different sources.

We’ll try to break it down a bit.

What impacts the home construction cost per square metre?

It depends on a number of factors:

  • the type of construction – is it a simple weatherboard home or an architecturally designed full brick home? Or something in between?

 

  • the size of the dwelling – a modest two bedder or a five bedroom family home with multiple bathrooms? Is it one level or two (or three)?

 

  • the complexity of the build – is it a level block that’s ready to go or is it mountainside with a need for excavation to prepare the site? Is the site easily accessible?

 

  • the quality of finishes – budget materials or marble imported from Italy?

 

  • location – with costs of petrol at record highs, the further your materials need to be transported, the higher your budget is likely to be.

 

Depending on who you talk to, prices can start at around $1200 per square metre and increase from there depending on all of the factors listed above. As a guide, costs typically consist of 50% for materials, 30-40% for labour (including consultants) and 10-20% for councils and permits. These costs are fluctuating greatly at present though with both materials and labour costs under significant pressure.

It’s a good idea to include a contingency amount to the total for unforeseen costs. Rule of thumb is to add an additional 10% to the total cost at a minimum, however if this is your first build, it would be prudent to add 20% to make sure you are well and truly covered.

 

Why look at the cost per square metre?

Calculating a home construction cost per square metre is a handy metric for comparison, especially if you’re deciding between two builders and need a like for like breakdown. It can also be a useful way to decide on your budget.

A per square metre (m2) figure is a great baseline and builders often use it for pricing jobs at a high level. This method for calculating construction costs simply multiplies the total floor area, in square metres, by the square metre amount.

To work out the square metreage, measure the length of an area (say the lounge room) followed by the width, then multiply the two measurements to give a square metre total.

Say for example your lounge room is 3.60 metres long and it’s 2.25 metres wide, multiplying them you get a total area of 8.1 square metres. It starts getting trickier when you have odd shaped rooms, but essentially once you work out the square metreage of each room, you add them all together and get the total area for the project.

If you have house plans produced they will tell you the areas, but it’s always good to have an understanding of how it all comes together.

So say you have a total area of 200m2 (which is around the average for houses in Australia, depending on which source you read), and you’ve been quoted a home construction cost per square metre of $1500, you will have a total build price of $300,000.

 

You need to check the quote carefully for what’s included and excluded – does it include landscaping? Driveways? Appliances?

 

There’s much to be mindful of.

 

Construction Cost Index

It’s hard to ignore the impact of rising prices on housing affordability.

There’s no doubt that costs have risen significantly in the past twelve months.

We’ve discussed in previous articles the reasons for these increases and they have been widely reported on. They include the impact of COVID, the war in the Ukraine, sanctions on Russian exports, increasing interest rates and surging petrol prices, just to name a few.

There have been multiple construction companies succumbing tp the current pressures on the industry.

Builders and developers should always keep a close eye on the construction cost index to inform their budgeting and planning decisions, but even more so in the current climate.

So what is a construction cost index?

In the same way that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) compares prices in each quarter or year to the same period in the prior quarter or year and gives a percentage change (generally an increase but not always), a Construction Cost Index does the same for construction costs.

There are multiple sources of data and it’s important to understand what the inputs to the model are in interpreting the metrics produced by the index.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics publishes a price index specific to the construction industry each quarter. This forms a great base for more in-depth analysis.

How can MCG help?

We at MCG Quantity Surveyors can help with all of these steps, from working out the square metreage of your project to determining a baseline home construction cost per square metre.

We’ll also help you keep a close eye on costs with reference to our Construction Cost Index.

MCG Quantity Surveyors are acutely aware of the current challenges faced by our clients when it comes to planning and assessing their property projects. We make it our priority to ensure our reports take into account all possible cost implications.

We may not be able to control rising prices or materials shortages, but we can definitely help you calculate your home construction cost.

We think that’s a pretty important step.

Contact us now for an obligation free quote on 1300 795 170 or go to our website mcgqs.com.au for more information.